John of the Cross wrote several spiritually inspired poems, of which Ascent of Mount Carmel is the most well-known. The letters he wrote to expand on these poems were mostly written addressed to a specific person who requested an explanation of the poems. John writes to people who want to grow deeper in a relationship with God, and attain a higher degree of mystical contemplation.
John metaphorically talks about the spiritual development of the person towards union with God as the “Ascent of Mount Carmel”, in which the “Dark night of the soul”is an essential part. The attributes of the different stages of this process are discussed in the following pages.
The natural man
For John it was self-evident that in human beings’ natural way of knowing and perceiving, the intellect can only grasp something through the senses and nothing that could be imagined or comprehended by humans can be a means to union with God. As supernatural knowledge is not available to us while we are in the body, faith takes the place of the intellect to lead us to God.
For the beginner in particular, intellectually imagined images may be helpful in meditation, but John’s intention is to train the person away from these images of the senses to complete destitution, resting in faith. This is in order to prevent the person from resting content with and clinging to sensual enjoyment of form, which does not have true value in communion with God. The believer should thus always seek to distinguish the Giver from the gift.
In books two and three of Ascent of Mount Carmel, John lists the insights and sources of pleasure that cheer a person, and then states that faith may require us to move beyond this. He believes that the definition of love is aligning our will perfectly with God’s. In practice this means not aligning it with anything else. The journey consists not in many new thoughts and procedures and feelings – though all this may in its own way be necessary early on – but only in denying yourself truly for Christ. The first reason for this is the underlying belief that God is pressing in, thirsting for union with the believer and that getting out of the way should be a priority. The Holy Spirit is therefore actively seeking out the believer and in order to hear his voice the main task of the believer is to get himself, his desires, preconceived ideas and prejudices out of the way.
A young believer often experiences emotions, excitement and supernatural visions. There is a danger in becoming dependent on these experiences, because they are not God.
Second, John lived in a culture that delighted in the extraordinary: “Visions, raptures, messages, saints, devils, angels, God – it was all there in one gloriously pious mix and one kink in people’s motivation could leave them hopelessly mixed up. “(Matthew 1995:100)
In response, John commented that people too easily imagined hearing from God and that the test whether it is really God they are hearing is whether the experience gives birth to humility, loves, dying to self, godly simplicity and silence. Although other experiences may be useful in stirring up faith and love, only faith, hope and love in Christ can be a direct means to God.
John believes that the soul of man is a blank slate at the point of creation. From then on information is taken in only via the senses. Without the senses the soul that is in a body would be as if in a prison without windows. The senses are the only windows of the soul to its surroundings and through them and by means of desire the soul is nourished and fed by the things in which it can take pleasure, according to its abilities.
John says that natural human desires cause evil in the soul by depriving the soul of the Spirit of God and by blinding, defiling and darkening the soul. As senses and desires stand in the way of the pursuit of spiritual development and are pure darkness in the eyes of God, the believer has to die to them. Darkness and light cannot coexist in the same person. John calls this process of dying to the senses and desires the night of the senses, the “dark night of the soul”.
Critique on the development of the person
In his introduction to the chapter on human fulfilment in the teaching of John of the Cross, Leonard Doohan states that the quest for development, fulfilment, and ongoing progress is a major characteristic of the time we live in. Doohan refers to Pope Paul VI’s speech on the development of the peoples in 1967, which encouraged Christians to foster this aspiration for self-actualisation as a means of solving the ravages of hunger, poverty, endemic disease world-wide:
“Endowed with intellect and free will, each man is responsible for his self-fulfillment even as he is for his salvation… he is the chief architect of his own success or failure… Self-development, however, is not left up to man’s option. Just as the whole of creation is ordered toward its Creator, so too the rational creature should of his own accord direct his life to God, the first truth and the highest good. Thus human self-fulfillment may be said to sum up our obligations… United with the life-giving Christ, man’s life is newly enhanced; it acquires a transcendent humanism which surpasses its nature and bestows new fullness of life. This is the highest goal of human self-fulfillment. The ultimate goal is a fullbodied humanism.”
Doohan states that although the believer first seeks union with God and experience personal fulfilment as a by-product, personal fulfilment is nevertheless an essential part of John of the Cross’ teaching:
The end of the journey is twofold: union with God and complete transformation and rediscovery of self. John’s life and system are not only examples of our awesome call to union with God, but also of humanity’s call to the genuine rediscovery of self and personal fulfilment.
The teaching of John and the message of Christ are barely recognisable in these statements. Rather, in line with the gospel, John taught that we are called to die to ourselves in order to become more like Christ. This is a night process through which the natural man dies to its senses and natural inclinations and is increasingly led by the Holy Spirit. In time man’s way of doing things becomes increasingly spiritual and irrational in the sense that it is motivated by obedience to God and not by what is rationally humanistic.
Yankelovich commented on the development of the current emphasis on self-expression and the psychology of affluence as follows:
“Up through the 1950s, all sacrifices for the family were regarded as morally valuable irrespective of whether they were necessary in practical economic terms. The cultural climate in the 1960′s raised the question of whether one needed to sacrifice one’s own self expressive needs if it was not economically necessary to do so. A ‘psychology of affluence’ – an attitude that self-sacrifice was no longer economically necessary – began to replace the Depression psychology of want and scarcity. It all added up to a radical extension of individualism – a psychological shift from giving priority to economic and physical security to giving priority to self expressiveness.”
This viewpoint has proved to be pervasive and insidious. Many people today think it is obvious that self-development and self-actualisation may and should be one of our main motivations. Anything that gets in the way of this progress is seen as unhealthy. There is also an increasing self-serving interest in spirituality and mysticism, but much less interest in discovering the self-sacrificing values that contributed to the spiritual growth of the believers whose lives are studied.
Transformation
The focus on progress, as it is applied in Doohan and Pope Paul VI’s comments above, may be self-defeating. It is possible that more will be achieved in uplifting the poor and downtrodden people of the world by fostering a loving, giving, self-sacrificing attitude among mankind, rather than by encouraging a self-serving attitude of self-actualisation.
Personal fulfilment, spiritual growth and human development in itself are pointless. What followers of Christ are called to is obedience to God. This obedience is only made possible by the love of and the love for God.
A young believer often experiences emotions, excitement and supernatural visions. There is a danger in becoming dependent on these experiences, because they are not God. In order to loosen the believer’s dependence on these feelings, visions and experiences, the Holy Spirit actively removes them from the believer.
“In John’s teaching the transformation of the person towards unity with God is punctuated by this dark night of the soul. The night is like a curve, which begins ascetically with an active renunciation of the world and progresses to the passive deprivation of delight in all things, even God himself. It then reaches the midnight of pure sightless faith and eventually reaches the dawn of substantial delight in God. The active and passive nights are, however, not successive phenomena. Rather, it impinges extensively on one another as aspects of the same process.” (Von Balthasar, H 1986)
The entire engagement of the faculties (memory, intellect, and will) in the things of the world, and the indulgence of the appetites in the pleasures of creatures are carnal activities that stand in the way of the new spiritual life. The believer is unable to live perfectly in this new life if the old self does not die completely. In this regard John quotes Paul the apostle: ‘Take off the old self and put on the new self who according to God is created in justice and holiness’ [Eph. 4:22-24].
In order to enter this process, the believer first has to have a habitual desire to imitate Christ in everything he does. To do this well, he or she must renounce every pleasure that presents itself to the senses for the love of Jesus Christ, who has no other pleasure than doing the will of God, which He called his food.
Union with God may be acquired in this life through the complete mortification of the old nature through the cross of Jesus Christ.
The night of the senses is a trial that has to be endured so that the sensory part of the soul is purified and strengthened, and the spiritual part is refined and purged, since impure souls cannot attain union with God. The purifying fire is experienced by some more intensely than by others, and by some for a longer time than on others, depending on the degree of union to which God wishes to raise them, and according to what they must be purged of. God wants all to be perfect, but He finds few vessels that will endure this dark process in which the person suffers great deprivation and feels heavy afflictions in the spirit.
It is clear, then, that for the soul to come to unite itself perfectly with God through love and will, it must first be free from all desire of the will, howsoever slight. That is, that it must not intentionally and knowingly consent with the will to imperfections, and it must have power and liberty to be able not so to consent intentionally.
Upon this road we must ever journey in order to attain our goal; which means that we must ever be mortifying our desires and not indulging them; and if they are not all completely mortified we shall not completely attain.
John’s friend, Teresa of Avila, did not agree with this approach. In reaction, she is quoted as saying: “God deliver us from spiritual people who are so spiritual that they want to turn everything into perfect contemplation, come what may. It would be a bad business for us if we could not seek God until we were dead to the world. Neither Magdalene, nor the woman of Samaria, nor the Canaanite woman was dead to the world when she found him.”
In a state of union with God, John describes the person’s animal life as being changed into spiritual life, its intellect informed by supernatural divine light, the will changed into divine love, the memory changed so as to have in its mind the eternal years mentioned by David [Ps. 77:5]. The natural appetite is now satisfied by delight of God and the soul is alive to God and moved by the Spirit of God [Rom. 8:14].
“The soul’s center is God. When it has reached God with all the capacity of its being and the strength of its operation and inclination, it will have attained its final and deepest center in God, it will know, love, and enjoy God with all its might. When it has not reached this point (as happens in this mortal life, in which the soul cannot reach God with all its strength, even though in its center – which is God through grace and his self-communication to it), it still has movement and strength for advancing further and is not satisfied. Although it is in its center, it is not yet in its deepest center, for it can go deeper in God. It is noteworthy, then, that love is the inclination, strength, and power for the soul in making its way to God, for love unites it with God. The more degrees of love it has, the more deeply it enters into God and centers itself in him. We can say that there are as many centers in God possible to the soul, each one deeper than the other, as there are degrees of love of God possible to it. A stronger love is a more unitive love, and we can understand in this manner the many mansions the Son of God declared were in his Father’s house [Jn. 14:2]. “(John of the Cross 1991: 645)
John compares this union with the relationship between a bride and bridegroom, stating that:
“True lovers are only content when they employ all they are in themselves, all they are worth, have, and receive, in the beloved; and the greater all this is, the more satisfaction they receive in giving it. The soul rejoices on this account because, from the splendors and love it receives, it can shine brightly in the presence of its Bridegroom and give him love.” (John of the Cross 1991: 673)
Conclusion
John’s mysticism and teaching on the person are not philosophical, but theological. All the words of the Bible are arranged concentrically around the annihilation of the Word of God on the cross. John’s teaching is therefore meant to be understood christologically, and only through Christ is it theocentric.
John had two visions of a person’s spiritual life. The one is innocent, consisting in a vision of God that can only be attained by natural death. The other is the perfect spiritual life, the possession of God through a union of love. This union may be acquired in this life through the complete mortification of the old nature through the cross of Jesus Christ.
Bibliography
Doohan, L 1995. The Contemporary Challenge of John of the Cross: an Introduction to his life and teaching. Washington, D.C. ICS Publications.
John of the Cross, Saint, 1542-1591 [Works, English. 1991] The collected works of John of the Cross. Washington D.C. ICS Publications.
Matthew, I 1995. The Impact of God: Soundings from St John of the Cross. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
Pope Paul VI, 1967. Populorum Progressio. Available from: http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/paul_vi/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-vi_enc_26031967_populorum_en.html. [Accessed 13 July 2006].
Von Balthasar, H 1986. St John of the Cross. Available from: http://www.carmelite.com/saints/john/b4.shtml. [Accessed 17 August 2006].
Wakefield, G (ed) 1983. A Dictionary of Christian Spirituality. London: SCM Press Ltd.
Willard, D, 2002. New Age of Ancient Christian Spirituality. Available from: http://www.dwillard.org/articles/artview.asp?artID=95. [Accessed 13 July 2006].
Yankelovich, D, 1988. The Shifting Direction of America’s Cultural Values. Available from: www.danyankelovich.com/scan98.html. [Accessed 13 July 2006].)